The purpose of this research paper is to explore the Supreme Court’s seemingly inconsistent application of the First Amendment to sectarian prayer at legislative meetings.Mallory Drummond, High Point University. To Pray or Not to Pray: Sectarian Prayer in Legislative Meetings Nonetheless, journalists have been threatened to be charged or charged with harassment for newsgathering. This study found that the wording of most harassment laws should prevent their application to newsgathering. This study explored whether state criminal harassment laws may be applied to punish newsgathering. Some sources threaten to file or file harassment charges on the basis of such actions. Newsgathering requires repeated telephone calls, aggressive questions, and investigation of matters that can cause emotional distress.Erin Coyle, Louisiana State University Eric Robinson, Louisiana State University.Ultimately, the paper proposes a three-step framework for mitigating the muddle and calls on the nation’s high court to take action to clarify the proper test for distinguishing between content-based and content-neutral regulations.Ĭalling Them Out: An Exploration of Whether Newsgathering May Be Punished As Criminal Harassment Building from McCullen, this paper uses a quartet of federal court rulings from 20 involving anti-begging ordinances affecting the homeless as analytical springboards for examining these issues in depth. Supreme Court’s 2014 divided decision in McCullen v. The troubles were highlighted by the U.S. This paper examines numerous problems now plaguing the fundamental dichotomy in First Amendment jurisprudence between content-based and content-neutral speech regulations.The paper also contrasts the public policy concerns of libel-by-communism cases with the ones that animate the defamation-by-homosexuality disputes that are garnering significantly more scholarly attention.īegging the Question of Content-Based Confusion: Examining Problems With a Key First Amendment Doctrine Through the Lens of Anti-Begging Statutes Although some scholars seemingly presumed libel-by-communism to be a relic of the Cold War era, the issue is very much alive and well in ethnic enclaves. The paper uses three recent cases involving false accusations of communism targeting Vietnamese war refugees residing in the United States as analytical springboards for tackling this issue. This paper examines the complicated issues of community and defamatory meaning that arise in libel law when plaintiffs allege reputational harm within ethnic and geographically-bound micro-communities.Additionally, the implications of the EU’s law will be contrasted and theoretically applied to the U.S.ĭifficulties and Dilemmas Regarding Defamatory Meaning in Ethnic Micro-Communities: Accusations of Communism, Then and Now This paper will explore how the unregulated flow of information is being balanced with the innate desire for individual discretion. With the European Union’s introduction of the Right to be Forgotten, people are requesting to hide data and search engines are being forced to comply. The lack of privacy regulation remains a concern in the United States and abroad. The Right to be Forgotten and Global Googling: A More Private Exchange of Information?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |